People's Republic of Southwark

It's here

Planning Watch
Canada Water Area Action Plan Deadline PDF Print E-mail
Written by Liliana Dmitrovic   
Wednesday, 10 February 2010 13:56

A quick reminder that the deadline for comments is 12th March.

If you want to have your say, you can either download the documents from here , or, for the ease of reading, you might want to ask for a printed copy from 0207 525 5471.

NB: Whether or not you actually get a printed copy is anyone's guess - we are still waiting for the copy of the Core Strategy we asked for on 1st February.

 
Council Proposals PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 02 February 2010 18:17

Elmington Estate, SE5 (presumed)

The number of affordable homes is now estimated to be 27 after a re-calculation, dunno what the original proposal was and, obviously, have no idea of final number as the council don't. It was the entire estate before the council decided to put affordable housing in.

Only residents are to consulted on the mix of redevelopment and refurbishment, presumably it is considered not to have any effect on anyone outside the area - it is our coucil tax.

Coopers Road, SE1

Land to be sold on a 125 year building lease. No other information available as it is in a closed report. The Head of Property can change the agreement and the freehold to be sold after completion of 50 homes - unless Head of Property decides otherwise.

Silwood, SE16

To be sold freehold to Higgins Homes plc and Notting Hill Housing Trust on gaining planning consent. Hmmmmm. More is in a closed report.

Peckham Road, SE5

West House, Central House, East House and South House are to be sold. The buyers will not require any additional land in Lucas Gardens, whether any land in Lucas Gardens is included in the sale is unkown as the information is closed. Parts of the buildings to be leased/licensed back to the council even though the council claimed as part of the Tooley St move these properties were surplus to requirements, facilities to be moved to Tooley St - or did we get something wrong here?

There is no information as to where the money raised is to go - any one giving good odds on the Tooley St lease?

Any other information is closed

Aylesbury Regeneration

Phase 1 of re-housing of residents to be approved and the re-housing to begin.

First stage of bidding process be noted - what this is we have no idea, it's closed.

 

We were hoping to bring you information on the Heads of Terms agreement for the Elephant & Castle Regeneration. So far Eleanor Kelly (Deputy Chief Executive) and her PA have only managed to let us have two documents relating to schools, the 15 page report we are after is more like 15 lines of rubbish.

 
Place formerly known as Camberwell Job Centre PDF Print E-mail
Written by Liliana Dmitrovic   
Thursday, 28 January 2010 16:20

The planning application for 1-6 Camberwell Road & 307-311 Camberwell New Road is now up on the Council's website.

The application is for yes more flats in yet another oversaturated, impoverished and 'underamenitied' area with severe traffic congestion problems.

To object to the proposal, please email your comments to the This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

Important update (17/02/10):

Some of the objections to the proposal so far have been about:

Design:
the building would destroy the existing character of the area (a number of buildings are Victorian with curved corners, bay windows, ex surgery on the corner of Camberwell rd/Camberwell New Road, Father Red Cap pub on the green); existing sightlines (rooftops, cupolas etc) would be affected

Height:
the proposal is taller than the surrounding buildings and would have a negative effect on the amount of daylight available;

Nature of the proposal:

Camberwell is already a high-density area with a great number social housing estates nearby. This space would be better suited as a community amenity to be used by all.

Parking:
development does not include any parking provisions. it is possible that some of the new residents already own cars which they would need to park somewhere. This could have a negative effect on already poor parking situation in the area.

Transport:
Transport problems around Camberwell town centre are already severe, as travel is exclusively road-based. Camberwell train station should be reopened before any new housing development is considered.

 

My own reservations are:

The first major concern I have about the proposal is the demolition rather than recycling of the space – the existing space can be used creatively and enhance and benefit the area without having to destroy then rebuild. Both demolition and rebuilding are costly, ecologically unsound and there are better alternatives.

The area around Camberwell Town Centre (which most certainly extends beyond Camberwell Green) is already suffering from severe traffic problems (lack of safe cycling routes; no overground train station; no underground; congested and not well planned and managed bus stops; continued issues with cars parked on pavements etc); proposed 129 new dwellings would mean at least 258 new people and I do not think that the existing infrastructure (including transport, GP surgeries, children's nurseries, facilities for disabled and older residents) could cope with this. I think that any new housing development is at present unrealistic as transport problems alone would need to be resolved first.

The height of the proposal would have a negative impact on people who live or regularly pass through the area. It would diminish the amount of daylight, restrict the feeling of openness of the area as it is at present – this can affect some people quite severely (people who suffer from S.A.D. for example).

The proposal does not include any public green spaces.

Camberwell Town Centre is a vibrant, densely populated mixed community, yet it is sorely lacking in any community amenities. This housing development proposal, although it makes provisions for some mixed use community amenity, would have no benefits for the local communities. A community-run community space or a cultural centre would.

Hope some of you may find this helpful.

The detailed list of all comments received can be seen on the council's website (search the planning applications for 09/AP/2896, click on the documents; comments are in the 'Neighbour Consultation Replies' document).

The deadline for responses is 23rd February. If you would like to comment, please email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , quoting the 09/AP/2896 reference and include your full name and address.

 
More more London PDF Print E-mail
Written by Liliana Dmitrovic   
Thursday, 28 January 2010 16:17
This week, More London are at it again, with two planning applications.

First one, 09-AP-2860, is for display of internally illuminated fascia sign, an externally illuminated projecting sign and an internally illuminated internal sign to building. Objections (quoting the application reference number to be sent to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it )

Second one, 09-AP-2578, for installation of new first floor mezzanine to existing restaurant, providing additional restaurant (Class A3) accommodation. No external alterations. Objections (quoting the application reference number to be sent to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it )

We urge you to object to both of them, and any other More London applications for as long as they do not make any considerations for cyclists.

Deadline for both applications is 31st January 2010.
 
Burgess Park PDF Print E-mail
Written by Liliana Dmitrovic   
Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:57

Plans for Burgess Park and the surrounding area still include the 'vision' for 10, 15 and 20 storey buildings. Burgess Park Action Group will have a deputation to Southwak Council this Wednesday, January 27th at 7pm to request the council not to pass a motion removing the ban on high rise buildings on the northern boundary of Burgess Park. The council proposes to replace the current Aylesbury Estate with even higher skyscrapers along almost the entire Albany Road boundary of the park.

The proposal is to allow a 10, 15 and 20 storey wall of bulidings along Albany Road and to remove the current set back, grass and trees along the northern side of Albany Road.

The deputation is protesting that this will turn the park into an oppressive enclosed space, instead of the precious open space promised by the Abercrombie Plan.

An independent consultant has calculated that the combined Aylesbury/Elephant projects will emit an extra one million tonnes of CO2. This is the equivalent of nearly two whole years of emissoins from every single household in Southwark.

If you can attend the Council Assembly meeting and show your support, Burgess Park Action Group would really appreciate it.